The 9/11 terrorist attack was a tragic day for America. If there’s a bright side, it’s the fact that it spawned a new generation of conspiracy theorists. The official mainstream explanation was so full of holes, a rational person simply cannot believe it.
In fact, 9/11 spawned one of my favorite words, “truther,” which apparently dates to 2005.
Of course, 9/11 isn’t the only historical event that has been lied about. The history books are overflowing with lies.
But World War II has to be an exception, right? I mean, how could politicians and media whores misrepresent an event of such magnitude?
You know what they say, figures don’t lie but liars do figure. If you take off your blinders and take a fresh look at WWII, you might be stunned at the magnitude of the deception. However, it should be a cakewalk for truthers who cut their teeth on 9/11.
Below are a few of the many question marks I’ve uncovered in my initial research. I’ll have much more to report in a forthcoming book(s).
Olympic Racism ˆ
Adolf Hitler is the international poster boy for racism. Yet few Americans are aware that the U.S. fought Hitler with a—get ready for it—segregated military. Moreover, the British and French possessed colonies around the world where non-whites were cruelly exploited. Winston Churchill was a notorious racist.
Double standard, anyone?
In fact, the biggest racists on the planet are likely Jews. Perhaps it’s their way of making up for their lack of athletic prowess.
No Jew could ever hope to compete with U.S. Olympic track star Jesse Owens, for example. Then again, a man who has been described as “perhaps the greatest and most famous athlete in track and field history” is a tough act for anyone to follow.
The greatest stage Owens ever performed on was the 1936 Olympic Games in Berlin, Germany. The media still regale the muddled masses with the story of this humble black athlete who became the star of the games, infuriating Die Führer, who touted Aryans as the superior race. How could the great Hitler suffer such embarrassment on his home soil? He couldn’t even bring himself to congratulate Owens.
Except it isn’t true.
It’s arguably half true. You see, Owens was indeed snubbed—by pResident Franklin D. Roosevelt. Don’t take my word for it. Owens himself said,
“Hitler didn’t snub me; it was [FDR] who snubbed me. The president didn’t even send me a telegram.”
In fact, none of the eighteen African American athletes who participated in the Olympics were invited to meet FDR. But it wasn’t just a leadership problem. Owns later recalled,
“When I came back to my native country, after all the stories about Hitler, I couldn’t ride in the front of the bus. I had to go to the back door. I couldn’t live where I wanted.”
In contrast, Owens was feted as a hero in Germany. It has even been reported that, as he competed in the Olympics, he was cheered by Germans but not Americans! Whenever Owens competed, they would yell “Jesse! Jesse! Jesse!”
Owens had a particularly interesting duel with German long jumper Luz Long.
After fouling on his first two attempts, Owens was nearly out of the competition. After Long gave him some advice, Owens took first place, with Long in second place. Long was the first to congratulate Owens, and they became good friends.
However, the question of Hitler’s reaction to Owens is steeped in mystery.
On the first day of the games, Hitler reportedly shook hands with all the German gold medalists and a few Finnish athletes. When the head of the International Olympic Committee told Hitler he could either congratulate all the gold medalists or none, Hitler opted to honor no one.
However, Hitler and Owens apparently did exchange friendly waves. But did they actually shake hands?
Veteran German sports reporter Siegfried Mischner claimed Owens had shown him a photograph of Hitler shaking his hand after the 100 meters event, behind the stadium’s honor stand. According to Mischner, Owens said “That was one of my most beautiful moments.”
Mischner, who went on to write a book about the 1936 Olympics, said other journalists saw Owens’ photo that same day and likewise didn’t report on it.
But if the story is true, why wasn’t Owens more forceful in confirming it? His daughter said he used to say “I didn’t go to the Berlin Olympics to shake Hitler’s hand.”
Of course, that cryptic statement doesn’t answer the question—or does it?
After the Olympics, Owens was under enormous pressure as he struggled to support a family in the racist USA. It wasn’t politically correct to say anything positive about Adolf Hitler, and doing so might have led to his crucifixion in the Jewish media.
Owens did state that Hitler didn’t snub him. Whether that was a reference to more than a wave isn’t clear.
Incidentally, Owens wore track shoes that were made by the German Adi Dassler, the founder of Adidas.
In other news, Germany won more medals than the U.S. In fact, the final tally was a one-sided 89-56. The U.S. would have fared even worse if it wasn’t for the black athletes who won six out of eleven gold medals, four of them won by Owens. If Owens proved that people of African descent are superior athletes, the Germans may have proved to be the best team players, a lesson they reinforced on the battlefields of WWII.
Colonial Games ˆ
Historian Howard Zinn is among those who believe that the United States wasn’t motivated to enter World War II by Hitler’s treatment of the Jews or the invasion of Poland. Rather, he claims it was the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor that ushered the U.S. into war.
He may have a point.
World War II started in 1939. Some big events occurred near the end of 1941:
- Dec. 7—Japan attacks Pearl Harbor
- Dec. 8—U.S. declares war on Japan
- Dec. 11—Germany and U.S. declare war on each other.
One thing that some people might find curious is the fact that Hawaii wasn’t even a state at the time. It was effectively a colony. We stole the islands from the Hawaiian people and built a military base there. We then provoked a war with Japan (more about that later), which responded by attacking Pearl Harbor.
Another interesting thing: When the U.S. declared war on Japan, it was joined by seven Latin American countries, including Haiti. Haiti, one of the poorest nations on the planet!
Why would countries that had long been exploited by the U.S. want to go to war with Japan on the plantation master’s behalf?
When the colonial British and French declared war on Germany, they were similarly joined by Australia, New Zealand, Transjordan, Morocco and Tunisia. Considering all the Moroccans and Tunisians who had been tortured by their French masters, that was mighty noble of them.
Take a look at Wikipedia’s list of Declarations of war during World War II.
Before you blame all the carnage on Adolf Hitler, you might want to ask why New Zealand, Morocco and Haiti were involved. Hitler never invaded their lands. In fact, Morocco was exploited by France, Haiti by the U.S. They were fighting on the wrong side!
Then there’s the Bengal Famine, which killed some three million Indians. If it had been caused by Hitler, it would rank alongside the Holocaust as one of history’s worst atrocities. But most Americans have never even heard of it. The famine, by the way, is generally blamed on the notoriously racist Winston Churchill.
In other news, the U.S. was a de facto part of WWII even before it officially declared war. It offered aid to the United Kingdom and later to the Soviet Union. Germany was also clobbered by U.S. propaganda and sanctions, most of which were largely orchestrated by Jews. Of course, the U.S. was also up to its eyeballs in WWI, which helped pave the way for WWII.
The Polish Paradox ˆ
The Jews want us to believe that the Germans started both World War II and World War I, whose murky origins are notoriously difficult to unravel. More precisely, the invasion of Poland is cited as the beginning of WWII.
But which invasion?
Did you know that Poland was invaded twice? Germany launched its invasion on September 1, 1939, with the Soviet Union invading from the east on September 17. Oops, I forgot—Poland was also invaded by the Slovak Republic.
Moreover, Hitler’s original goal was to take back a small portion of Poland that was originally German territory. The Soviet Union, on the other hand, occupied Poland, along with most of Eastern Europe, after WWII. Moreover, an earlier advance of “Communism” into Europe was halted by Poland, which won the Polish-Soviet War (1919-1921) at the Battle of Warsaw, often remembered as the “Miracle of the Vistula.” The Soviet Union also attacked other countries before WWII as it openly bragged about spreading Marxism around the world.
If you smell a can of worms, be warned: I’m just getting started.
If we are to condemn Hitler for sucker punching the Soviet Union, then we should also condemn the Soviets for sucker punching Poland. And if Poland marked the beginning of WWII, then why didn’t the Allies declare war against Germany and the Soviet Union both?
Apparently, the British and French both signed treaties with Poland promising to protect the country from German aggression—but not from Soviet aggression. If this is true (I haven’t yet confirmed all the details), then blaming WWII on Hitler is really just a technicality.
Do you understand what I’m saying? If the Western Allies declared war because Germany did something bad, then they should have also attacked the Soviet Union for doing something even worse. Instead, they declared war on Germany because of a treaty. And if that treaty led to WWII, then maybe the morons shouldn’t have signed the treaty in the first place.
How could a war between two neighboring countries qualify as a “world war”? It didn’t become a world war until the British and French declared war on Germany, dragging their colonies into the conflict.
There’s more to the story…
In the wake of WWI, Germany lost territory to Poland, France, and Belgium. Lots of people of German descent lived in some of these territories, including Poland. While we hear endless stories about German brutality, we seldom hear about the human rights atrocities the Poles committed against German-speaking peoples.
The Germans were even blamed for a Soviet atrocity, remembered as the Katyn Massacre.
In 1940, the Soviets murdered 22,000 of the best and brightest Poles of their generation in Russia’s Katyn Forest, then blamed it on the Nazis. Representatives from the Polish government visited the site and determined that the Soviets were indeed responsible. However, U.S. and British officials didn’t want to lose the Soviet Union as an ally.
And so all parties blamed the Katyn Massacre on Germany. The Soviet Union even included the grisly event among the list of Nazi war crimes presented at the Nuremberg trials.
During the trials, it became clear that the Soviets’ version of events was full of holes. However, the Soviets didn’t have to worry about being held accountable, as the Tribunal could only exercise jurisdiction over “the major war criminals of the European Axis.” The Soviets would never have to answer for the Katyn Massacre, and the British and Americans would never answer for the dreadful destruction of Dresden, Germany.
Only Germans and their allies could be guilty of war crimes.
And another thing…Germany is commonly cited as the capital of anti-Jewism (“antisemitism”). But guess what? The Jews weren’t terribly popular in Poland, either. In fact, Poland is said to have a particularly high rate of anti-Jewism today.
The French Paradox ˆ
Many people think philosophy is boring, weird or just plain useless. But don’t tell that to the ghost of Jean-Paul Sartre, a French patriot who became a philosophical pop star in the 1960’s.
Sartre practically deified the Latin American revolutionary Che Guevara, who rivals Adolf Hitler as one of my biggest heroes as well. The most famous existentialist, Sartre had a lot to say about colonialism and political corruption in general.
On the negative side, I don’t think Sartre had a clue about the Jews—unless he was secretly working for them. Like Guevara, Sartre also embraced Marxism. I have to confess, I used to be somewhat enamored of Marxism myself, until I began researching the history of the Soviet Union. Although I love socialism in the broad sense of the term, Marxism seems a little too Jewish to me. But that’s another story for another time.
It’s understandable that a Frenchman would be upset with Germany’s defeat of the French military and occupation of Paris. Kudos to Sartre for fighting back, though he never saw the big picture.
In some respects, Sartre’s WWII experience seems almost comical. For example, he was captured by German troops in 1940 and endured nine months of torture as a prisoner of war.
In fact, Sartre wrote his first theatrical piece—Barionà, fils du tonnerre, a drama concerning Christmas—while being held at Stalag XII-D. During his captivity, Sartre also read Martin Heidegger’s Sein and Zeit.
Sartre suffered from poor health, claiming that his poor eyesight and exotropia affected his balance. So what would you expect the evil Nazis to do with such a useless prisoner?
They released him in April 1941. Given civilian status, Sartre then regained his teaching position at Lycée Pasteur near Paris.
But Sartre was an existentialist. He had to do something to give his life meaning, so he participated in the founding of the underground group Socialisme et Liberté (“Socialism and Liberty”).
However, the French resistance wasn’t firing on all cylinders. There was more passion for assassinating French collaborators than German officials. Many of Sartre’s compatriots had little enthusiasm for assassinating anything, and Socialisme et liberté soon dissolved.
Sartre decided active resistance wasn’t his thing and began writing instead. He wrote Being and Nothingness, The Flies and No Exit and also contributed to both legal and illegal literary magazines. The evil Nazis didn’t even censor his books. It must have been the mother of insults.
Then again, Sartre’s trilogy apparently had little to say about the war or the German occupation. After being released from a German prison and let down by his French colleagues, Sartre was finished with the resistance aside from daily conversations at the Café de Flore with other intellectuals.
However, Sartre did comment on the occupation in “Paris under the Occupation,” which, as near as I can determine, wasn’t published until 1998, long after Sartre had passed away.
Keep in mind that Adolf Hitler wasn’t a big fan of France. The putrid Treaty of Versailles was signed in France, and the French treated the Germans like shit afterwards. After Hitler’s Wehrmacht crushed France in just six weeks, Hitler danced a famous jig in celebration.
Given the Nazis’ reputation for almost supernatural evil, what fate would you expect to befall the French? Would the Germans emulate Genghis Khan and slaughter every man, woman and child in Paris? Or would they tone it down and just use the men for prison labor while raping the women?
This is what Sartre had to say:
“The Germans did not stride, revolver in hand, through the streets. They did not force civilians to make way for them on the pavement. They would offer seats to old ladies on the Metro. They showed great fondness for children and would pat them on the cheek. They had been told to behave correctly and being well-disciplined, they tried shyly and conscientiously to do so. Some of them even displayed a naive kindness which could find no practical expression.”
That’s a helluva lot better than the French treated people in their colonies.
In fairness, there were food shortages during the occupation. Sartre complained about living on a diet of rabbits. Yet the Americans and Englishmen who liberated Paris were surprised to to find a city full of mostly healthy, well-dressed people, including women wearing elegant dresses.
As you might imagine, it was an awkward situation for both Anglophone liberators and French “victims.”
I’ve also read that French men were worried about the safety of their women in the company of Americans and Brits, while they felt pretty safe around the Germans. So who were the thugs?
In summary, I’m a big fan of existentialism, and I think it’s so cool that Sartre lionized Che Guevara, but I’ve come to regard Sartre as an ivory tower philosopher who didn’t really have a deep understanding of politics.
Nuremberg Witch-Hunt ˆ
Who better to decide the fate of the defeated Germans than the…U.S. Secretary of the Treasury?
Henry Morgenthau, Jr. suggested a plan for the total “denazification” of Germany. Known as the Morgenthau Plan, it advocated the forced de-industrialization of Germany and the summary execution of so-called “arch-criminals” (i.e. the major war criminals). pResident Franklin D. Roosevelt initially supported the plan and managed to convince Winston Churchill to support it in a less drastic form.
When details of the plan were leaked in the U.S., however, there was widespread condemnation by the nation’s newspapers, and the idea was scrapped.
The vengeful Morgenthau, by the way, was a Jew. The office is currently held by another Jew, Steven Mnuchin, who was appointed in 2017.
Mnuchin is a former Goldman Sachs associate and hedge fund manaager who has been sued for “asset stripping” and questionable foreclosures. In other words, he’s a typical Jewish banker. But don’t worry; the Jews had only driven the national debt up to $27.6 trillion by the end of 2020.
After the Morgenthau Plan was scrapped, the Allies settled on a series of show trials known as the Nuremberg Trials. The trials had some prominent critics.
Characterizing the Nuremberg Trials as a “fraud,” Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court Harlan Fiske Stone said,
“[Chief U.S. prosecutor] Jackson is away conducting his high-grade lynching party in Nuremberg[.] I don’t mind what he does to the Nazis, but I hate to see the pretense that he is running a court and proceeding according to common law. This is a little too sanctimonious a fraud to meet my old-fashioned ideas.”
Associate Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas wrote that the Allies were guilty of “substituting power for principle” at Nuremberg.
“I thought at the time and still think that the Nuremberg trials were unprincipled. Law was created ex post facto to suit the passion and clamor of the time.”
The ex post facto criticism was also raised by Robert A. Taft, a U.S., a US Senate Majority Leader from Ohio and son of William Howard Taft. Taft’s position contributed to his failure to secure the Republican nomination for president in 1948.
In a letter to pResident Harry Truman (the man who dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki), Justice Robert H. Jackson said that the Allies themselves “have done or are doing some of the very things we are prosecuting the Germans for,” including violation of the Geneva Convention and the Soviet Union’s aggression against the Baltic states. In fact, the Soviets tried to pin the Katyn Forest Massacre (perpetrated by the Soviets) on Germany during the Nuremberg Trials.
Although German citizens were tried for conspiracy to commit aggression against Poland, the Soviet invasion of Poland was politely ignored. Nor were Allied powers Britain and the Soviet Union tried for preparing and conducting the Anglo-Soviet invasion of Iran (1941) or the Winter War (1939–1940), respectively.
The main Soviet judge, Iona Nikitchenko, had presided over some of Joseph Stalin’s most notorious show trials during the Great Purges of 1936 to 1938.
Ironically, just nineteen Germans were convicted at Nuremberg. If the stories manufactured by the Jews were half true, shouldn’t hundreds of thousands of Germans have faced the gallows?
The United States’ lust for blood was tempered by its appreciation of German talent.
While the Nuremberg Trials were in progress, thousands of former Nazis were brought to the U.S. in what was code named “operation paperclip.” They played a critical role in setting up NASA and the CIA. The most famous was the legendary rocket scientist Wernher von Braun, who later became the head of NASA’s Apollo program and helped send Americans to the moon.
Of course, some people believe the first moon landing was a hoax. I explore that topic in my book Conspiracy Science.
In the meantime, type “Nuremberg Trials” + farce into a search engine, and you’ll find plenty to think about.
“Simon Says” Wiesenthal ˆ
If Elie Wiesel is the most famous (alleged) Holocaust survivor, Simon Wiesenthal is probably number two.
After the war, Wiesenthal gained fame as “the Nazi hunter,” tracking Aryan scum down all around the world. One can imagine Harrison Ford (a Jew) channeling Wiesenthal as the Holy Ghost, the spirit of God or whatever consumes Nazi villains in Raiders of the Lost Ark.
On close inspection, however, Wiesenthal’s life story is as flaky as Obama’s qualifications for the Nobel Peace Prize. Even Wikipedia, which appears to be controlled by the Jews, makes some startling admissions.
“In his autobiographies, Wiesenthal tells how he was arrested on 6 July, but saved from execution by his former foreman, a man named Bodnar, who was now a member of the Ukrainian Auxiliary Police. There are several versions of the story, which may be apocryphal.”
Here’s one my favorites:
“With a reputation as a storyteller, Wiesenthal was the author of several memoirs containing tales that are only loosely based on actual events. In particular, he exaggerated his role in the capture of [Adolf] Eichmann in 1960.”
Wiesenthal claimed he miraculously escaped becoming part of a mass execution when someone nominated him as the best man available to paint a giant poster in honor of Adolf Hitler’s birthday. Yet another Wiesenthal story drew this comment:
“Wiesenthal did not mention either of these events—or Kohlrautz’s part in them—when testifying to American investigators in May 1945, or in an affidavit he made in August 1954 about his wartime persecutions, and researcher Guy Walters questions their authenticity. Wiesenthal variously reported that Kohlrautz was killed on the Soviet Front in 1944 or in the Battle of Berlin on 19 April 1945.”
Guy Walters is a British writer and historian who has authored or edited nine books about the Second World War. Walters has expressed frustration at the enormous amount of junk history that continues to grow and has raised questions about fraudulent Holocaust memoirs. Regarding Wiesenthal’s alleged exploits as a Nazi hunter, Walters said,
“There were too many distortions and inconsistencies, too many outright lies… In my view, Simon Wiesenthal was a liar and a fraud.”
While behind enemy lines, Wiesenthal allegedly tried but failed to commit suicide to avoid being interrogated about his connections with the underground. He got a lucky break, though: There was no time for interrogations as Soviet forces were advancing into the area.
In late 1941, Wiesenthal was happily painting swastikas and eagle shields at the Lviv Railroad Repair Yard when the head SS soldier asked him where he was educated. Remembering that an educated Jew was a dead Jew, Wiesenthal lied, claiming he went to a trade school.
After several men reported Wiesenthal’s lie, he was confronted by the SS officer, who asked why he lied. After Wiesenthal confessed, he won the SS officer’s respect and was given the job of architectural design and a comfortable office. A German senior inspector who was secretly anti-Nazi gave him two pistols, which he hid in his office.
Yet again, Wikipedia notes some discrepancies:
“There is no corroboration for the above account. In Wiesenthal’s testimony to the War crime investigators in May 1945, he does not mention these incidents or Kohlrautz’s part in them, and neither were the events included in an affidavit he made in August 1954, recounting his wartime experiences. He did, however, mention senior inspector Kohlrautz in both, stating that he was killed in the battle for Berlin in April 1945. Wiesenthal later told his biographers that Kohlrautz had been killed on the Russian front in 1944.”
But my favorite Simon Says story is one I’ve dubbed Simon Wiesenthal’s Big Toe Adventure.
The story begins with a big rock falling on Wiesenthal’s big toe in October 1944 while he worked in a quarry at the Gross-Rosen concentration camp. His seriously injured toe had to be amputated.
Wiesenthal was still ill in January when advancing Soviet troops forced another evacuation, this time on foot. The winter march was a major inconvenience for Wiesenthal, whose foot had become gangrenous
Yet, armed with a broom handle for a walking stick, Wiesenthal was one of the 4,800 prisoners who survived the 170-mile march to Chemnitz out of a total of 6,000. From Chemnitz the prisoners were marched to Mauthausen concentration camp, arriving on February 15, 1945. It was almost the end of the road for the nine-toed Ukrainian road warrior
Lories were dispatched to collect the bodies of prisoners who had died on the march. Among them was Simon Wiesenthal, who had collapsed in the snow. After being taken to a crematorium, however, it was discovered that he was still alive. He was then transferred to the “death block” for the mentally…er, mortally ill.
Long after the war, Wiesenthal stated in an interview that the gangrene had spread up to his knee. He lay in bed, unable to get up, for three months until the end of the war, surviving on just 200 calories a day. Yet when Mauthausen was liberated on May 5, 1945, the Miracle Jew walked out to greet the Americans.
I’m not a medical doctor, but what are the chances of a starving prisoner of war surviving gangrene over a period of months? If said prisoner marched 170 miles in the dead of winter, then collapsed and laid unconscious on the ground until a lorry picked him up, after which he was transported to a crematorium—presumably in an unheated vehicle—wouldn’t that person develop a rather severe case of hypothermia?
And why would the evil Nazis devote valuable resources to caring for a nine-toed Jew who was unable to perform valuable labor? It doesn’t add up.
Even a fellow Jewish Nazi hunter, Eli Rosenblum, rejected Wiesenthal, saying that “the stories of his investigative exploits were largely bogus” and that he had “wrongly accused innocent people.” (Were any of them imprisoned or executed?) He said Wiesenthal’s habit of spreading bullshit actually made it harder to apprehend Nazi war criminals.
But don’t take my word for it. Read the article “Simon Wiesenthal – Hero or Conman?”
The Holocaust’s #1 poster boy, Elie Wiesel, appeared to be full of hot air, too. But he got his just reward when a Jewish crook named Bernie Madoff stole his life savings.
What Holocaust? ˆ
There’s no question that Jews living in Germany were persecuted by Hitler’s administration. After the British and French (or the Jews) started WWII, the Germans extended their persecution to Jews living in countries they invaded.
However, the nature of the persecution isn’t clear, and the rationale behind it is generally just attributed to racism.
I agree with those who argue that the Jews brought the Holocaust on themselves. Frankly, I wish an Adolf Hitler would rise up here in America and get rid of all our goddam Jews.
In other words, I would argue that Hitler held the Jews accountable.
Whether or not the Germans killed large numbers of Jews in gas chambers is a hard question to answer. After all, such an event wouldn’t leave many eyewitnesses.
However, there is a lot of evidence debunking the Jews’ Holocaust theory
For example, have you ever heard of the Haavara Agreement? It enabled the migration of approximately 60,000 German Jews to Palestine in 1931-1939. The Jews were even allowed to transfer some of their assets to Palestine. Note that the measure overrode severe restrictions on Jewish immigration into Palestine imposed by the British.
At the time, Palestine was a relatively pastoral place, where Arabs and Jews co-existed peacefully. Arabs were worried that Germany’s policies would create a Jewish majority. They sought Germany’s help against both the Jews and the British.
Sadly, their prophecies were all too accurate. Today, Israel ranks as arguably the biggest terrorist state and the most racist state. Even worse, the Jews control both Germany and the U.S., both of which shower Israel and alleged Holocaust victims with money.
Another little known fact: Thousands of Germans of Jewish descent served in the German military under Hitler. Twenty of them were awarded the Knight’s Cross, Germany’s highest military honor.
In the meantime, we know the mainstream Holocaust narrative is true because of the sinister chemical Zyklon B, right? I mean, we’ve all heard stories about the piles of clothing and shorn hair lying outside rooms into which Jews had been herded like cattle. Once inside, they were dispatched with Zyklon B.
In fact, Zyklon B was a cyanide-based pesticide invented in Germany in the early 1920’s. It was commonly used for delousing clothing. It was even used by the U.S. government on the U.S.-Mexico border.
Given the fact that German concentration camps were brimming with Jews and prisoners of war, along with the fact that the war imposed additional hardships on the camps, isn’t it logical to assume that the prisoners would be treated with chemicals to prevent the spread of disease? Jews—which long ago earned their reputation as the world’s greatest hucksters—later pointed at the piles of clothing and Zyklon canisters and coined the term “Holocaust.”
Firms in a number of countries continue to produce Zyklon B under alternative brand names. And they aren’t accused of Holocausting.
Double Genocide? ˆ
No, it isn’t a new game show.
A Jew named Raphael Lemkin coined the term genocide, which has so many definitions and connotations it has come to mean nothing. Just as Holocaust spawned the term Holocaust denial, so have the Jews built upon genocide to give us “double genocide.”
In a nutshell, the Jews portray WWII as little more than a war between good (represented by the Jews) and evil (Adolf Hitler and the Nazis). The poor Jews also represent war’s suffering, arrogantly ignoring the countless people of diverse races, religions and ethnic groups who suffered.
In fact, Hitler was a saint compared to Soviet strongman Joseph Stalin. Whether or not Stalin was of partly Jewish descent I don’t know, but his biggest executioners were Jews. Moreover, it’s commonly believed that the Bolshevik Revolution was a Jewish conspiracy. Marxism, of course, is based on the works of Karl Marx, a Jew.
In the 1990’s, people in the Baltic States began asking “What about us?” Why are Holocaust museums scattered across Europe and the U.S. like fast food restaurants, but there’s scarcely any mention of the horrors Eastern Europeans suffered at the hands of the Soviet Union?
Moreover, some versions accuse Jews of complicity in Soviet repression. Local persecution of Jews can therefore be viewed as retaliation.
In fact, invading German troops were cheered by many Soviet citizens who hoped Hitler could rescue them from their own leader.
But the Jews insist there can only be one genocide. In fact, they weren’t too happy with the book American Holocaust, which explores the Europeans’ five-hundred-year war against Native Americans (not to mention the environment). Indeed, Jews stubbornly support Ayn Rand, a vile, racist pseudo-philosopher whose motto could have been “Screw the Indians.” Rand’s book Atlas Shrugged also made her the goddess of capitalism, which of course trumps race.
The Big-Lie Lie ˆ
“If you tell a big enough lie and tell it frequently enough, it will be believed.”
That quote is popularly attributed to Adolf Hitler. In fact, Hitler never said it.
I asked a question about it on a Jewish history forum. To my amazement, I got a straight answer: “What is the origin of this Hitler quote regarding lying?”
Jews’ Rules ˆ
Genghis Khan was one hell of a tyrant. He conquered more territory than Hitler did, and he did it on horseback.
The Great Khan killed a lot of people, too. According to Britannica.com, his conquests caused the deaths of approximately forty million people, which added up to a significant percentage of the global population at that time.
An estimated 75-80 million people died during WWII, about 3% of the global population in 1940. The Jews like to blame all of the deaths on Hitler, who they claim started the war.
However, the Germans weren’t responsible for the Bengal Famine, the fire bombings of Dresden and Tokyo or the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Hitler is credited with killing as many as thirty million people in genocidal campaigns, but those figures are almost certainly wildly exaggerated. The total could have been 100,000, for all we know. Or maybe closer to zero. And the Jews brought the Holocaust on themselves.
Hitler’s bloodiest adventure was the invasion of the Soviet Union, which ended with the deaths of some 26.6 million Soviet citizens. The war on the Western Front was much tamer; I believe the British and French combined lost about one million.
At any rate, one has to wonder if Hitler really killed more people than Genghis Khan. Even if he did, he was primarily fighting a defensive war. The Mongols were on the warpath.
To cut to the chase, a 131-foot tall statue of Genghis Khan on horseback stands on the bank of Mongolia’s Tuul River, about thirty-four miles east of the capital city of Ulaanbaatar. By Genghis, the great conqueror is also commemorated on stamps!
So where’s the outrage? Khan spread death and destruction from China to Eastern Europe and the Middle East. Pound for pound, he was a far more accomplished killer than Adolf Hitler, and he really did dream of conquering the world. And no one cares!
But there’s an even more devilish Asian icon that the Jews care about very much: the swastika. It’s associated with both Hinduism and Buddhism, among other things.
Asians don’t really have a monopoly on the swastika. It also has deep roots in Europe and has even been used by Native American tribes. But the Jews insist it’s THEIRS.
Hitler persecuted the Jews beneath a flag bearing a swastika, and therefore no one on Earth is allowed to display a swastika. Violating this sacred code in Germany can get you thrown in prison.
Of course, the Jews don’t have as much control in Asia. But occasionally, a video of an Asian entertainer wearing clothing emblazoned with a Buddhist or Hindu swastika appears on YouTube. The Jews then begin wailing and gnashing their teeth. “Don’t you realize how much pain you’re causing?” they moan as they cash their latest Holocaust welfare checks.
The offending entertainer is then lectured about the Holocaust. Stunned and embarrassed, if not devastated, they promise to never make the same mistake again. Thus, Asians are taught to hate their own culture!
In fact, it is the Star of David that should be outlawed around the world. I increasingly agree with historians who believe the Jews started both world wars, along with most major subsequent wars. That would make them the world’s champion killers, beating Hitler, Joseph Stalin and Genghis Khan combined.